“She had a right not to be subjected to this kind of behavior, regardless of what may have motivated it or prompted it,” the prosecutor said. “This is not the kind of aberrant behavior that anyone should accept,” the prosecutor added.Ĭunningham said the first officer “unfortunately suffered some consequences” as a result of the incident that Haak “didn’t have anything to do with,” but he didn’t elaborate. Let’s rescind this requirement and stop letting companies hide behind an overreaching law that allows kids to be kicked off of flights.Alex Morgan Earns This Year's NWSL Golden Boot Award This is when you know federal law has gone too far. This whole incident isn’t likely to help the airline’s reputation, which is already under fire for the draconian way in which it’s been enforcing coronavirus mask rules.Įarlier this month, a Southwest flight attendant booted a family from a flight after the parents informed them that, because of their 3-year-old son’s disability, he might have difficulties with his mask - which, to be clear, he’d been wearing at the time. Haak any benefits he was entitled to receive as a result of his separation from (the airline),” a spokesperson told the AP.
“Southwest did investigate the matter and as a result, ceased paying Mr.
However, he was not given a break by the airline itself.
MICHAEL HAAK PILOT PICTURE FULL
He was charged in Maryland because it was one of the states that the aircraft passed over that day,” the AP reported.īecause of a “sterling,” decades-long career full of “accolades,” he was given a break via both his relatively light sentence and also a waiver of the usual requirement that he register as as a sex offender. “Haak was charged in April with intentionally committing a lewd, indecent or obscene act in a public place, a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of 90 days in jail. He wasn’t formally charged until last month. This seems to suggest that she was disciplined by Southwest Airlines over the matter - perhaps because she had indeed given “consent?”Īs for Haak, he voluntarily retired three weeks after the incident occurred, at which time he received “supportive letters from passengers and colleagues, including one from Southwest chairman and CEO Gary Kelly,” according to the AP. Strangely, he also reportedly said that the first officer had “unfortunately suffered some consequences” from the incident that “didn’t have anything to do with” Haak. She had a right not to be subjected to this kind of behavior, regardless of what may have motivated it or prompted it,” prosecuting attorney Michael Cunningham reportedly added. “This is not the kind of aberrant behavior that anyone should accept. The judge told Haak that his actions had a traumatic effect on the co-pilot and could have impacted the safety of passengers and other co-workers,” the AP reported. “The first officer submitted a statement to the court but didn’t speak during Friday’s hearing. What’s known is that she now claims she’s been traumatized by the event. It’s also not clear why the unnamed first officer said nothing at the time. “As the plane continued its flight, Haak further engaged in inappropriate conduct in the cockpit, as the First Officer continued to perform her duties as an assigned aircrew member.” “Haak admitted that, after the aircraft had achieved cruising altitude, Haak got out of the pilot’s seat, and while still in the cockpit of the plane, intentionally disrobed and viewed pornographic media on a laptop computer,” the press release continues. It’s not clear that consensual pranks are ever carried out between people who just met. “Haak was assisted by a female First Officer who Haak had never met prior to that flight,” according to a press release from the Department of Justice. But what federal prosecutors had to say about the matter suggests otherwise.
0 kommentar(er)
